Loading
Loading the requested page.
New York · Washington · London · Singapore
+1 (212) 555-0142Loading
Loading the requested page.
Office · Opened 1979
Regulatory, investigations, and employment counsel, a short walk from the agencies that generate the work.
Visit
Marlowe & Sterling LLP1330 Adams Court NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20036United States
The Washington office opened in 1979 for a single client and a single problem: an energy company that had discovered, three weeks before a filing deadline, that nobody in its organization could explain its own reporting position. The office has spent the forty-six years since doing versions of that work.
Forty-one lawyers practice here, concentrated in regulatory counseling, government and internal investigations, and employment. The office runs the firm's investigations protocol — the standing procedure for how privilege, document preservation, and witness interviews are handled from the first hour of a matter, before anyone knows how large it will become.
Washington also houses the firm's public interest secondment program, which places two associates each year with legal services organizations for six-month terms at full salary.
Practices here
Internal and government investigations, enforcement defense, and the controls that prevent the next one.
Senior transitions, restrictive covenants, workplace investigations, and the employment side of transactions.
Litigation and international arbitration in matters where the outcome changes the business.
Development, investment, and financing across logistics, data centers, and energy assets.
People
Representative Matters
Three authorities, three timetables, and a screening system that had been correctly designed and incorrectly configured.
A departure that had to be announced, a covenant that had to be enforced, and a business that had to keep its clients through both.
Contact Washington
Call +1 (202) 555-0168 during Monday to Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time, or write to washington@marloweandsterling.com. Describe the matter in general terms and name the parties involved so a conflicts check can be run before anything substantive is discussed.